There will be a public beta that is targeted at end users, but later, and it will, as always in the past, include the Linux player.”Įven there is no authoring tool with gui for linux there are very good development solutions:
#Adobe shockwave player windows xp software
“There is no authoring software for Linux and therefore there is no need for a public beta of the Linux player at this time. To summarise it once again: Macromedia has been supporting UNIX since 1999 (HP-UX, Solaris/SPARC, Solaris/x86 and Linux/x86), Macromedia will continue to do so, Macromedia will not open-source the player, Macromedia needs official Mozilla builds to validate the player against and Macromedia needs a frozen C++ ABI, please contact the Free Software Foundation and ask them to freeze their C++ ABI forever. If you want OpenSource, implement it yourself, the specs are available, and if you want official support for other platforms, contact the Mozilla Foundation and ask them for Mozilla builds because Macromedia needs them to produce a player!
#Adobe shockwave player windows xp code
Macromedia sells the source code to licensees and will continue to do so. If there will be another Linux player, it won’t be version 7 because that would be incompatible with future Mozilla releases, it can only be a version 8, compiled with GCC 4.Īnd please don’t ask for OpenSource again and again. And something else: The player is written in C++, but we are right now in the middle of yet another Linux C++ ABI breach. i686 binaries run natively on AMD64, there is no “emulation”. First the browser, then the plugins.įurthermore, an AMD64-compiled browser is nonsense because it gives 0 (zero) advantages over an i686 one. This is impossible because the player must work with official builds, but there are none! If you are unsatisfied, redirect your anger from Macromedia to the Mozilla Foundation because they are the ones who must do something. What should Macromedia validate such a player against? A self-compiled build or an unofficial one from Fedora or SuSE? Macromedia cannot release an AMD64 player at this time because there are no Mozilla builds for AMD64! The Mozilla Foundation refuses to release builds for anything else than i686 for good reasons, i.e. There will be a public beta that is targeted at end users, but later, and it will, as always in the past, include the Linux player. There is no authoring software for Linux and therefore there is no need for a public beta of the Linux player at this time. Didn’t you read Macromedia’s press release? This very early beta is not meant for users who want to test, it is for content developers who want to detect and report compatibility issues as early as possible.
0 kommentar(er)
